Categorie: 2015

  • Acts 8:9-25 Sermon in IREF 16 August 2015 ‘Discerning counterfeit’

    Hymns: Ps. 148, 757, 426, 769, 895

    Two weeks ago: start with a small series about Acts 8. We saw the first confrontation of the early church with suffering – the heartbeat of the church: the peaks and valleys in the cardiogram. God seems to allow suffering and persecution in order to purify his church, to separate the chaff from the wheat. But suffering also gave rise to a major growth in the church. ‘The blood of martyrs is the seed of the church.’

    In this passage we find another confrontation. It is the confrontation with forgery (1) in the world and (2) in the church. The Gospel is confronted by religious counterfeit in the world around and surrogate faith in the church (among the believers). Main question: how can we (1) discern and keep ourselves from false religion and (2) how we discern surrogate in faith and how we will avoid this.

    I Now the author Luke tells us about a sorcerer with the name of Simon who amazed all the people of Samaria. He didn’t seem to be an innocent illusionist or a trickster; no he performed something using supernatural powers. We don’t know what kind of acts he performed, but we maybe rather sure that he did something with is common practice in the world of magicians, sorcerers and fortune-tellers: healings, calling forward spirits of dead people (connecting the living with the spirits of the dead), foretelling future. Obvious points in what Luke tells us here:

    • He was focused on his own personality and position, seemed to lack the virtue of humility, boasted that he was something great.
    • People around of all standards, young and old, were very enthusiastic about him (‘ecstatic’). Het got the attention of them and they followed him (made themselves dependant on him).
    • They attributed godly power to him. What did they mean with ‘Great Power’ (Samaritan designation of the supreme deity and Simon as a representative or a mediator of this deity? Justinus Martyr who came from Samaria, says that this man was known even in Rome because of his magic).

    In verse 12 it is clear that there is a confrontation of powers when the Gospel arrives in Samaria. Philip preached the good news of the Kingdom of God and the name of Jesus’ (vs. 12). Both the words ‘kingdom’ and ‘name’ express power and authority that appears to be greater than the supernatural world of magic. 

    Is the story of Simon the kind of story that we hear now and then in reports of the mission field in remote parts of the world where sorcerers and magicians are still active? Does this kind of stories refer rather to the early Christian world or maybe to the Middle Ages (with a lot of superstition)? Is this far form our reality, because we live in a secular age, in a scientific and technical world, in which God and gods don’t play any role? Far from us living in a city of science and technics? I don’t believe so!

    1. It is amazing how many people visit healers (paragnosts, psychic healers) using alternative medical approaches. Often this kind of healers are adherents of New Age, a sort of Gnostic, hidden knowledge of godly powers in the universe. In many cases people report to be healed by these healers. (Story of a man, actually he was a member of the Protestant Church whose wife had cancer. He visited a healer and showed a picture of his wife. The man immediately announced what kind of cancer she had. Later she came to be healed by a sort of rubbing (laying on hands).
    2. Occult or half occult (occult means: hidden or dark, driven by a unknown, seemingly demonic power) games are popular in Dutch high schools. Playing with tarot cards (foretelling future) or a Ouija plate or reversed glasses. Children like to have some answers about future in relationships, work or family.
    3. In all cultures people are looking for happiness. But in our (Western) culture people we are so focused on that it is part of a whole business. We must discern that there is a whole army of ‘happiness brokers’ behind. They sell happiness in the form of therapies. You may find a known glossy that is called Happinez e.g. Very popular are Yoga and ‘mindfulness’ (which is not nonsense), but it let people fall back on themselves. They need to mobilize their inner (spiritual) powers and it is a way of self-salvation.
    4. It is important to discern what are the powers behind? Several therapies for mental peace have Buddhist or Hindu roots. Often you can find occult elements in it. We cannot say: ‘If it works, it is OK’. Is it the power of the living God working in and through his creation, or do we deal with occult, demonic powers? Is it from God or is it from a ‘counterfeit-god’? The Bible is very clear about witchcraft, sorcery and fortune-tellers. Only look at Deut. 18: 9 – 14. It all is not that innocent. God warned his people for what seemed to them an attractive world. People who have consulted healers might have been healed for the moment, but began to have lots of spiritual, mental and psychological problems. Yes, you can win your body but loose your soul. You can master future but loose your eternal destiny with God.
    5. You may say: ‘I am not religious at all, and I don’t believe that there is something more between heaven and earth. I like science, I like to be a researcher ‘ Still as a scientist you have to acknowledge that science is not neutral. That it can serve destructive powers, that it can serve as a religion, promising you everything you need, but you will discover sooner or later that it cannot bring you the full truth, beauty and wisdom to live for and to die for…

    The Gospel brings light in something that was hidden so far. Vs 12: ‘they were baptized, i.e. brought under the authority of the Gospel and of Christ the Lord. That’s what the Gospel always does: it reveals the counterfeit in what we admired so much. It shines in all the dark corners and it uncovers all the counterfeit, the unreal, that what cannot be trusted in the end. It unmasks the true nature of idols that are very popular in society. When I was in the midst of my teenage years I somehow was influenced very much by something that I call ‘nature mystics’. Nature, plants and birds were nearly a kind of personality giving me comfort and peace. I spent hours and hours in nature and felt the mystic force. I could easily have developed myself like a New Ager. I could easily have become a fiery animal protector, or even a lonely wolf, feeding destructive powers in myself. But the gospel, when it came in my life, fully opposed this and I left this position by God’s grace, but still I feel the attractiveness…

    II The passage reveals something else: not only counterfeit religion in the world around, but also counterfeit faith in the church. There are two stages in the breakthrough if the light of the Gospel in Samaria. The first contains Philip’s proclamation of the gospel and the Spirit worked with signs and miracles. The second stage is when the apostles Peter and John come from Jerusalem, not just to be inspectors, but to pray for the new converted people, and to lay hands on them. Only then the believers receive the Holy Spirit. We don’t know exactly happened, but we may be sure that new signs like speaking in tongues and a full joy came over them. This second stage indicates the breakthrough of the Gospel to the Samaritans, which was a new phase. Later the Spirit was received after repentance and baptism.

    Simon came to faith and was baptized, astonished as he was by the great sign and miracles he saw (vs. 13). Did he pretend that he believed (knowing himself that he was play-acting) or was his faith sincere? Simon believed and was baptised and followed Philip everywhere. The uncovering of the counterfeit in his faith happens when he wants to posses the ability to give the whole Spirit by laying on hands.

    You may know that in the time after Reformation church leaders and pastors were very keen on thinking through different types of faith, discerning the true and the false forms of belief. There is British branch in Reformation that we call ‘the Puritans’ that developed a strong teaching in their teaching and sermons how to discern false and true faith. I remember that I even learned as a child that there are all kinds of faith:

    • Historical faith (knowing and believing the facts of the Bible, but not living from it)
    • Temporary faith (a first enthusiasm for God and eagerness to serve Him, that cools down after a period, and is overruled by other priorities in life).
    • Faith of wonders- or faith in miracles (a faith that is based on the experience of miracles and signs ascribed to the intervention of God. It is a form of emotional and self-centred faith that can easily fade away when hardships come).
    • True, saving faith (the faith that is like an empty hand that needs to be filled by God’s grace; faith by which we see unworthiness and sin in ourselves, but wants to rely on the grace and power of the living God.)

    This puritan discernment is based on the parable of the Sower that Jesus tells (Matth. 13:1v). The seed that falls on the pathway (and the birds pick the seeds), the seeds that falls into rocky places (not much soil), among the thorns (that choked the little plants in the end), and the good soil (where it produced a crop).

    So maybe we can say that Simon at least had a faith in miracles (vs. 13). There was some change in his life. He follow Philip, he who amazed others, was amazed himself about the miracles.

    But you begin to discover the counterfeit in his faith when he wants to receive the ability of giving the Holy Spirit by laying on hands on people – this must have evoked special signs, maybe speaking in tongues -. Seemingly he considered this as something magic, a power that he even wanted to buy offering money to the apostles! (From this event the term ‘Simony’ is drawn – Simony means that an office or ministry in the church can be purchased by money). It is clear that Simon didn’t understand the nature of grace and the work of the Spirit. He still argued on the basis of his old view. His mind and heart were not changed. Look what he says after the great rebuke of Peter (‘Your heart is not right for God’, vs. 21): ‘pray that nothing may happen to me…’ (Instead of asking prayer for repentance – he still thought about himself rather than that he honoured God).

    The whole story may provoke the question in us: why do you believe? Is this because you wanted to have a better life, a more promising future, or did you believe because of amazing experiences??

    CS Lewis: ‘We don’t believe because the Gospel is inspiring, because it gives us a better life, because it promises us a hopeful future, but because it is true. It brings us the truth that we are sinners and that we cannot be rescued except by the saving work of Jesus. The Gospel doesn’t say what we have to do, but it says: ‘ It has been done’. That’s an important mark of true faith: that He is on the throne and not I, that He is in the centre and not I.

    Are my heart and soul longing for the living God? God is very patient with those who are sinners, even with his own people when they sin. He is very patient with those who doubt, have many questions about who He is and how he works, but He strongly opposed counterfeit. See the strong words of the apostles in vs 20-23. Counterfeit comes from Satan, Gods opponent. Satan has been called the great monkey, that copycats, ‘monkeys’ the truth and power of God. Satan needs to be opposed, you cannot negotiate with him or play with him.

    Dear bothers and sisters let us pray for the Holy Spirit, who searches every human heart, to reveal to us what is true and false, to uncover the surrogate in the church and in our life, so that we give all honour and glory to Him, the living Lord.

  • Female leadership in the church

    Conclusions and recommendations for IREF-Delft, November 2015

    I Starting point: Biblical references

    Old Testament

    God created men in His image, both male and female (Gen. 1:27). In Gen. 2 we read that God created Eve as a help (counterpart) for Adam (Gen. 2:18). The word for ‘help’ is the same word God uses for Himself. God created men and women with the capacity to communicate and to cooperate with one another to rule over creation.

    The dependency of women on men (Gen. 3: 17) is a consequence of the fall and part of God’s judgment. Through Christ the relationship between men and women is reconciled and put in a renewed position (‘In Christ there is no man or woman’ Gal. 3: 28) and in a new order (Eph. 5: 21 v – ‘be subject to one another’, and from there: ‘wives submit to your husbands as to the Lord.., husbands love your wives, just as Christ loved the church.’)

    In the Old Testament official positions (offices) were mainly given to men, which mirrors the cultural setting of a male dominated society in the Middle East in old times. Nevertheless it is striking that God sometimes breaks through this pattern and uses women in leadership positions in crucial periods, like Deborah (Judges 4), who was a female judge and prophetess. Other examples can be found in Ex. 15 (Miriam), 2 Kings 22:14 (Hulda) and Isaiah 8:3 (the wife of Isaiah).

    New Testament

    In the New Testament the offices of king, priest and prophet are given to all in the church. Cf 1 Peter 2: 9: ‘You are a royal priesthood’, and also 1 Cor. 12 and 14, where the apostle Paul indicates that he wants all to be prophets. The Catechism of Heidelberg sees the offices of king, prophet and priest realized in Christ (Sunday 12). And through Christ, by His Spirit also given to the believers: as a Christen we are anointed to be kings, prophets and priests!

    In the church of the New Testament offices or duties are closely linked to spiritual gifts (charismata) like the gift of prophesy in 1 Cor. 12:28 and 1 Cor. 14:1, or the gift of leadership (prostamenos) in Rom. 12:8.

    In the New Testament we discover a wide series of leadership positions or ‘acknowledged duties’: elder (presbuteros), deacon (diakonos), apostle (apostolos), pastor (poimen), teacher (didaskalos), prophet (prophetes), evangelist (euangelistos), overseer (episkopos – which seems closely connected to ‘elder’ in Acts 20:28, Phil. 1:1, 1 Tim. 3:2 and Titus 1: 5, 7).

    In most cases the acknowledged duties were given to men (and this reflects the usual pattern in surrounding culture as well). Jesus didn’t chose women in his circle of 12 disciples, but the accounts of the four gospels show great evidence about the role of women in spreading the Gospel, testifying and preaching about Jesus.

    We find many cases of female leadership as well, like in Rom. 16:1-16. Phoebe is called a deaconess and a helper, prostatis in Greek. Next to her are mentioned: Priscilla (vs. 3), Mary (vs. 6), Tryphena, Tryphosa and Persis (vs. 12). Also in Phil. 4:2 Euodia and Syntyche and in 1 Tim. 3:11 ‘the women’, which is often translated as ‘their women’ (i.e. the women of the elders and deacons), but it is more apt to take this as female workers in the church (like in 1 Tim. 5:9). Besides that God used many women on crucial moments in the history of salvation, like Mary who was chosen to become the mother of Christ, Mary Magdalene, who was –with other women- the first witness of Jesus’ resurrection, and Anna (Luke 2:36) who testified about God’s salvation in Christ. In Acts 2: 17 Peter quotes Joel 2:28 indicating that both sons and daughters will prophesy.

    Difficult texts

    We need to give special attention to two sets of texts indicating that women should be silent in the church: 1 Cor. 14: 34 and 35, and 1 Tim. 2: 11-13. About these texts many books and articles have been written. We cannot explain these texts without their literal and also cultural context. In 1 Cor. 14 the apostle doesn’t simply indicate that women should be silent, because elsewhere he indicates that they prophesy (1 Cor. 11:5), but he wants to avoid disorder of women overruling the plain teaching of the Word by bringing their questions and opinions very loudly and disorderly (he uses the word ‘lalein’ which indicates more ‘speaking in disorder’). For the women it seems to have been a sign of emancipation (together with the custom to have her hair cut and to avoid veils) and the apostle rebukes the Corinthians because they don’t do what the law (Thora) indicates and they let confusion arise.

    In 1 Tim. 2 the setting doesn’t seem to be the church, but the family at home. What the apostle indicates here is rather similar to his teaching about the roles of men and women in marriage and family in Eph. 5: 21v. Paul warns the women not to dominate in teaching and opposes the secularizing emancipatory culture around. The family is the first place where this should be shown. It doesn’t mean that women are not allowed to teach. They may teach in many ways, but the apostle seems to indicate that they should not exercise a dominant, ruling position over men, both in the family and in the church.

    II Three major approaches

    Summarizing we see three major approaches dealing with female leadership in the church.

    1. Focus on the work of God the Father, the Creator

    In this approach man and wife have different positions in society. Man is created first and He is the ‘head’ of the wife. This approach emphasizes the order in creation and denies official church offices to women. It advocates for a literal explication and application of the ‘silence texts’ in 1 Cor. 11: 7-9; 1 Cor. 14: 34, 35, 1 Tim. 2: 11-13; Titus 2: 5 and 1 Peter 3: 1. This is the position of most Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches.

    2. Focus on the work of God the Son and reconciliation

    Men and women are equal in Christ (Gal. 3: 28, Col. 3: 18; Eph. 5: 21v). Both humbly submit themselves in love to Christ and to one another. However, there is a renewed order in salvation: God – Christ – man – women, as the apostle Paul indicates in Eph. 5. What he says about marriage is an example for the church and for the wider society. In this approach women can have leadership positions in the church, but it is not obliged and depends on the need. This is the position of the mainline Protestant, Lutheran and Reformed denominations, and more recently the Anglican church.

    3. Focus on the work of the Spirit andthe spiritual gifts. 

    This approach emphasizes the Scripture passages about the gifts like Romans 12: 3 – 8 and 1 Cor. 12. Because both sexes are gifted equally by the Spirit, they both should have offices in the church. This position is mainly found in a number of Pentecostal and Charismatic churches and in ‘fresh expressions’ of church.

    III Conclusions for IREF

    1. In IREF several church traditions come together including different (theological) positions related to the issue of female leadership. IREF is connected with the Reformed and Evangelical conviction. We emphasize the work of the Triune God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Regarding female leadership we feel connected most with the second approach in the previous chapter.

    2. Women have played and play an important, if not crucial role in IREF’s history, in all kinds of ministries, except the role as a member of the steering committee. From Gods work in creation as well as from the practice in the early church we learn that we cannot think about a part of church life that can be guided without the help of women.

    3. We see acknowledged positions of leadership in the church closely connected with the gifts and experience of people. We want gifts to flourish in the church and one of the means is to connect these gifts and experiences with an acknowledged duty.

    4. If somebody who is married is called to an acknowledged duty or office, this calling also includes the consent and the help of the partner. See the example of Aquila and Priscilla who worked together for the Gospel. (Rom. 16: 3v). If somebody who is married and has a family is called to an office, let him or her speak and pray carefully through it, whether this duty can be combined with the responsibilities of the family.

    5. There is no Biblical reason to withhold the office of deacon from women.

    6. We acknowledge that God may call women on leadership positions in the church related to the need of the church and the availability of gifted people. Both the IREF Leadership team and the Council may welcome male and female members.

    7. In trying to understand what the Bible says in Ephesians 5 verses 21v. we aim to keep a majority of men in the IREF Council. We believe that in normal circumstances ruling and overseeing offices (the long run leadership responsibilities and accountability such as that of elder, overseer and pastor) should be given to men first. In case of emergency God may call women as well for that positions.

    8. Next to the ‘official’ tasks (offices) in the church as they are discerned in the Presbyterian and Protestant churches, we encourage the evocation of ministries that correspond with special gifts (e.g. the task of evangelist, prophet, teacher, administrator…) both in men and women.

    9. Referring to this special gifts the explanation and proclamation of the Word of God can be entrusted incidentally to women.

    We want to practise what we propose in humble obedience to the Word of God, with the longing that He will be glorified most and that the needs of the church and the society around are met in the best way.

    November 2015, in consideration with IREF Committee, pastor Niek Tramper